L.E. v. Cobb County School District

55 F.4th 1296 (2022)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

L.E. v. Cobb County School District

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
55 F.4th 1296 (2022)

Facts

Students L.E., B.B., A.Z., and C.S. (collectively, the students) (plaintiffs) had respiratory disabilities. The students attended schools in the Cobb County School District (the school district) (defendant). During the 2020–21 school year, the school district implemented COVID-19 safety procedures for in-person schooling that included mandatory masking, social distancing, classroom sanitization, vaccination requirements, and strict quarantine requirements. In early 2021, the school district gave all students the option of either attending school virtually or in person for the 2021–22 school year, stating that the safety procedures would remain in place. The students chose to go in person. Before the 2021–22 school year started, the school district changed its procedures, dropping the mask and vaccination requirements and easing up the social-distancing and quarantine requirements. Concerned about the students’ safety, their parents (plaintiffs) withdrew them from in-person schooling. The students and their parents sued the school district in federal district court, alleging that the school district was violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act by refusing to provide the students with reasonable accommodations that would allow them to attend in-person schooling. The students and their parents also requested a preliminary injunction requiring that the school district implement additional safety measures so the students could attend school in person while the lawsuit was pending. The students argued that being unjustifiably isolated through virtual learning was discriminatory. The district court rejected this theory and found that the school district’s virtual-school option was likely a reasonable accommodation that provided the students with meaningful access to education. Accordingly, the district court denied the preliminary-injunction request. The students and their parents appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership