L & J Crew Station, LLC v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
United States District Court for the District of the Virgin Islands
278 F. Supp. 2d 547 (2003)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
In June and July 2002, L & J Crew Station, LLC (L&J) (plaintiff) opened two accounts with Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BP) (defendant). When L&J did so, it agreed that either party could end the account relationship by providing written notice. L&J was in the business of transmitting money but did not disclose this to BP when L&J opened the accounts. By August, BP became concerned about the volume and nature of L&J’s account activity and discovered that L&J had insufficient internal controls and procedures and had no, or did not follow an, antimoney-laundering program. In September, BP notified L&J in writing that BP was terminating L&J’s accounts because the accounts posed an undue regulatory and compliance burden on BP. In November and December, L&J opened accounts with FirstBank Puerto Rico (FirstBank) (defendant). L&J did not tell FirstBank that L&J was in the money-transmitting business or that BP had notified L&J that BP intended to close L&J’s accounts. BP closed L&J’s accounts in December. Also in December, FirstBank notified L&J of its intent to close L&J’s accounts; FirstBank closed the accounts in January 2003. L&J sued BP and FirstBank, alleging, among other things, that BP and FirstBank wrongly relied on the USA PATRIOT Act (Patriot Act) in closing its accounts. BP and FirstBank moved to dismiss L&J’s Patriot Act claim for failure to state a claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.