L. Smirlock Realty Corp. v. Title Guarantee Company

418 N.E.2d 650, 52 N.Y.2d 179 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

L. Smirlock Realty Corp. v. Title Guarantee Company

New York Court of Appeals
418 N.E.2d 650, 52 N.Y.2d 179 (1981)

LJ

Facts

In November 1967, the town of Hempstead, New York (Hempstead) condemned and acquired title to property located in Long Island. The condemned property was located on and directly adjacent to 31-39 Carvel Place (the property), which was owned by Bass Rock Holdings, Inc. In 1969 foreclosure proceedings commenced against the property. The attorney for Hempstead spoke with the attorney for a potential purchaser, who later formed L. Smirlock Realty Corp. (Smirlock) (plaintiff), and informed the potential purchaser that a portion of the property had been condemned by Hempstead and should be excluded from the foreclosure proceedings. The purchase agreement between Bass Rock Holdings and Smirlock established that Smirlock would receive the condemnation award owed by Hempstead. Bass Rock Holdings sold the property to Smirlock, and a title policy was issued by Title Guarantee Company (defendant). Following the sale, Smirlock spent approximately $95,000 improving the property and leased out the entire premises. Shortly thereafter, it was discovered that Title Guarantee had failed to conduct a master check and that access roads to the property had been condemned by Hempstead. This significantly impeded access to the property, rendering it valueless. Consequently, the lessee vacated the premises, and the property went into foreclosure. Smirlock filed an action against Title Guarantee for damages, citing Title Guarantee’s failure to discover the condemned roadways as part of the title search prior to issuing the title policy. Title Guarantee raised the affirmative defense of misrepresentation, alleging that Smirlock had knowledge of the condemnation affecting the property and failed to disclose its knowledge to Title Guarantee. The trial court found in favor of Title Guarantee because Smirlock had withheld a material fact. The appellate court affirmed but did not believe that the misrepresentation was material. Instead, the appellate court asserted that had Title Guarantee been informed by Smirlock of the condemnation affecting the property, Title Guarantee would have checked records that would have led it to the discovery of the access-road condemnation. Smirlock filed an appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jasen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership