United States Supreme Court
352 U.S. 249 (1957)
Two antitrust actions were filed in the district court. They involved multiple plaintiffs and defendants and were “burdensome” on the district judge, Judge La Buy. Due to the burden and complexity of the cases, along with the congestion in his court, Judge La Buy entered orders referring the cases for trial before a master. Petitions for mandamus subsequently were filed seeking writs of mandamus ordering La Buy to vacate the orders. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued the writs under the All Writs Act, ordering La Buy to vacate his orders and hear the case. La Buy appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.