Court of Appeals of New York
277 N.E.2d 641 (1971)
Laba (plaintiff) and Carey (defendant) contracted for the sale of Carey’s property. The contract of sale required Carey to delivery title free of all encumbrances except those noted in the contract. The contract was made subject to the “covenants, restrictions, utility agreement and easements of record,” provided they have not been violated. A title search revealed the existence of a recorded telephone easement and a “Waiver of Legal Grades” restrictive covenant, which required any successive owner of the property to install a sidewalk in accordance with the legal grade at any time the Commissioner of Highways directed. The sidewalk in front the subject property and all the surrounding property was below legal grade, but neither the easement nor the covenant had ever been violated. The title insurance company reported that the seller had good and marketable title, which it would insure, but excluded the easement and covenant from its coverage. Laba informed Carey that he was prepared to close provided that the existing tenant had vacated the premises. Carey responded that their agreement only obligated him to serve the tenant a notice of termination. Laba then refused to close, claiming a failure to deliver good, marketable and insurable title due to the easement and covenant. Laba sued to recover his deposit, legal fees, and title examination fees. The trial court dismissed the complaint, but the appellate division reversed without awarding legal fees. Carey appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scileppi, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.