Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Stop Treaty Abuse-Wisconsin, Inc.

United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
843 F. Supp. 1284 (W.D. Wisc. 1994)


Facts

The Lac Du Flambeau band (plaintiff) was a subset of the Lake Superior Chippewa Indian tribe. Throughout the mid-1800s, the Lake Superior Chippewas signed treaties with the United States government in which the Chippewas agreed to give up land in Wisconsin and other states. As a part of these treaties, the Chippewas reserved the right to continue to hunt and fish on the land. This included the right to spear fish in the lakes and rivers throughout the region. Spear fishing was otherwise illegal throughout Wisconsin, and with the exception of a few lakes, non-Indians in Wisconsin could not engage in spear fishing. In 1988, a Wisconsin corporation called Stop Treaty Abuse-Wisconsin, Inc. (STA) (defendant) began to protest the Chippewas’ special right to spear fish. STA members would hold large protests where Chippewa spear fishing was taking place and would obstruct the fishing with motorboats and disturb the fish. The protesters would also taunt the Chippewas and yell racial slurs, as well as call the Chippewas derogatory names and harass them repeatedly. To encourage continued protests, pamphlets were distributed that depicted the Chippewas as lazy and dependent on government assistance. Eventually, the Lac Du Flambeau band sought a permanent injunction against the STA to stop the interference with the Chippewas’ right to spear fish. The Lac Du Flambeau band alleged that the STA was racially discriminating against the Chippewas in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1982, which provided that all individuals were entitled to the same property rights as the rights enjoyed by white citizens. The federal district court initially granted summary judgment to the Lac Du Flambeau band. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit remanded the case and instructed the district court to determine whether racial discrimination had occurred.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Crabb, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.