LaCroix v. Senecal
Connecticut Supreme Court
99 A.2d 115 (1953)
Celestine L. Dupre executed a will on March 25, 1951 with a clause leaving one-half of the residue of her estate to “my nephew, Nelson Lamoth of Taftville Connecticut” and the other half to Aurea Senecal (defendant). She then executed a codicil revoking the residuary clause of her will in order to replace with a new residuary clause that gave one-half of the residue of her estate to “my nephew Marcisse Lamoth of Taftville Connecticut, also known as Nelson Lamoth” and the other half to Aurea Senecal. One of the attesting witnesses to the codicil was Senecal’s husband. Pursuant to state statute, however, a bequest to the spouse of an attesting witness is void so that the witness’ competency to testify in support of probate is not impacted by the gift. Upon the petition of Dupre’s niece (plaintiff), Dupre’s heir at law, the probate court admitted the will to probate. Although the probate court found that the gift to Senecal under the codicil was void, the probate court nevertheless found the gift to Senecal under the original will to be valid. Dupre’s niece appealed to the Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.