Ladbroke v. William Hill
United Kingdom House of Lords
[1964] 1 All E.R. 465 (1964)
- Written by Wesley Bernhardt , JD
Facts
Ladbroke (defendant) and William Hill (plaintiff) were bookkeepers in the business of sports betting in the United Kingdom. William Hill repeatedly sent football-betting coupons to its clients. These coupons were printed on pieces of paper and listed upcoming matches between different football teams. Additionally, the coupons offered bets on these matches to clients. In 1959, Ladbroke began sending out very similar coupons to its clients. During litigation, Ladbroke suggested the coupons were similar to a trader’s catalogue displaying different goods for sale, rather than an original work.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jacob, L.)
Concurrence (Pearce, L.)
Concurrence (Evershed, L.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.