Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Lafler v. Cooper

United States Supreme Court
132 S.Ct. 1376 (2012)


Facts

Anthony Cooper (defendant) was charged with assault with intent to murder and other offenses after he pointed a gun at Kali Mundy’s head and fired. The bullet missed and Mundy fled. Cooper ran after Mundy firing the gun repeatedly, hitting Mundy several times. On two occasions, the prosecution offered to dismiss two of the charges and to recommend a sentence of 51 to 85 months in prison on the remaining two counts in exchange for a plea of guilty. Cooper initially agreed to accept the plea offer but later rejected it on both occasions after his attorney convinced him that the prosecution would not be successful at trial. Cooper was convicted on all four counts and sentenced to serve 185 to 360 months imprisonment. Cooper subsequently filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal court against Blaine Lafler, warden of the Michigan correctional facility where Cooper was housed. In his petition, Cooper renewed his claim that his defense counsel was deficient in violation of the Sixth Amendment. The district court conditionally granted the writ and ordered the original plea bargain offered to Cooper to be applied. The court of appeals affirmed and the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Scalia, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.