LaGrand Case (Germany v. United States)
United Nations International Court of Justice
2001 I.CJ. 104 (Judgment of June 27) (2001)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Karl and Walter LaGrand were German nationals who were convicted of crimes and sentenced to death in Arizona. After their convictions, the LaGrands were notified by United States (defendant) law enforcement of their right to consular access. Prior to their execution dates, Germany (plaintiff), via its officials, wrote several letters to United States officials seeking to halt the execution of German nationals. Karl’s efforts to appeal through the United States court system were unsuccessful, and he was ultimately executed. Germany then filed an application instituting proceedings against the United States to prevent the execution of Walter, claiming it violated the Vienna Convention. The International Court of Justice then issued provisional measures stating that Walter should not be executed until a final decision was issued. On the same day, Walter was ultimately executed. Germany asserted claims that the United States violated international law by not following the provisional measures. The United States argued the measures were issued too close to the execution and were not binding.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.