Laidlaw v. Organ
United States Supreme Court
15 U.S. 178 (1817)
Organ (plaintiff) was negotiating to buy tobacco from Laidlaw (defendant). Prior to consummation of the sale, Laidlaw asked Organ if he knew of any reason that the market price of tobacco would suddenly change. Organ stated that he did not, but in fact, Organ knew that the War of 1812 had just ended, which almost doubled the market value of the tobacco. Laidlaw was not aware of this fact. The parties completed the sale and Laidlaw delivered the tobacco. However, when Laidlaw heard the news of the war ending, Laidlaw stole the tobacco back from Organ. Organ then brought suit. The trial court granted a directed verdict to Organ, instructing the jury that Organ did not say anything to Laidlaw “calculated to impose upon him with respect to [the news about the war], and to induce him to think or believe that it did not exist.” Laidlaw appealed on the grounds that the jury instructions were improper.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.