Lainer v. City of Boston
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
95 F. Supp. 2d 17 (2000)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Gary Lainer planned to attend a Boston Red Sox (club) game at Fenway Park (Fenway) with a friend. After the friend canceled at the last minute, Lainer tried to sell the friend’s $18 ticket at face value near the stadium. The purchaser gave Lainer a $20 bill, but before Lainer could provide change, he was arrested by two City of Boston (defendant) police officers for allegedly violating, among other things, Boston’s antiscalping law prohibiting “engaging in the business of selling any ticket” without a license. The charges against Lainer were dismissed a few days later. Lainer sued Boston and the commissioner of the Boston Police Department (BPD) (defendant) for illegal seizure, false arrest, and false imprisonment. Lainer sought a preliminary injunction against, among other things, BPD’s interpretation of the antiscalping statute to apply to all sales of the club’s tickets outside Fenway. Per Lainer, the antiscalping law barred only the unlicensed sale of tickets as a business venture, not an individual’s ad hoc sale of an excess ticket. Moreover, Lainer produced substantial evidence that BPD had a policy of arresting anyone it found selling tickets outside Fenway under any circumstances. BPD responded that any ticket resale is a commercial transaction and thus all resellers engage in the ticket-selling business under the antiscalping law. BPD further argued that the club’s ticket policy explicitly prohibited ticket resales and thus neither Lainer nor others could legally resell tickets to the club’s home games.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tauro, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.