Laitram Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

791 F. Supp. 113, 22 U.S.P.Q.2d 1597 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Laitram Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
791 F. Supp. 113, 22 U.S.P.Q.2d 1597 (1992)

Facts

Laitram Corporation (plaintiff) owned several patents related to calculators. Laitram sued Hewlett-Packard Company (HP) (defendant) in federal court for making and selling calculators that infringed on Latraim’s patented calculator technologies. The lawsuit involved several complex issues related to findings of liability, including infringement, invalidity, and patent enforcement. The procedure for determining recovery of the royalty damages sought by Laitram was similarly complicated, involving the analysis of 15 unique factors and difficult computations related to finances and accounting. HP moved for separate trials, seeking one proceeding on liability issues and another proceeding with a different jury on damages and willful infringement because willful infringement is only relevant to damage calculations. HP also requested two separate phases of discovery, with a first phase limited to liability-related discovery and, if HP were found liable, a second phase permitting discovery of evidence related to damages and willful infringement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Feldman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership