Lake Region Credit Union v. Crystal Pure Water, Inc.

502 N.W.2d 524, 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 774 (1993)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lake Region Credit Union v. Crystal Pure Water, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court
502 N.W.2d 524, 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 774 (1993)

Facts

In 1987 Russell and Franzella Gilliss (defendant) were sued in mortgage foreclosure for a 50-acre plot of land. Along with Bruce and Renee Gilliss, Russell and Franzella owned a closely held corporation named Crystal Pure Water (Crystal) that bottled water. Crystal’s bottling operation sat on a 1-acre tract surrounded by the 50-acre tract owned by Russell and Franzella, which contained springs and wells. Crystal held title to the 1-acre tract. A sheriff’s sale was conducted for the sale of the 50-acre tract. Collectively, the four Gillisses secured a $125,000 loan from Lake Region Credit Union (Lake Region) (plaintiff) to refinance their business. In exchange for Lake Region’s purchase of the sheriff’s certificate, the Gillisses granted Lake Region mortgages on the 1-acre tract and the 50-acre tract and personally guaranteed Crystal’s debts. The Gillisses also gave Lake Region security interests in all of Crystal’s personal property, which included the company’s water permit. Unfortunately, Crystal defaulted on the $125,000 loan, and Lake Region sued, seeking to foreclose on its security interests and to collect on the Gillisses’ personal guarantees. Lake Region settled with Bruce and Renee before trial. A trial court ruled in favor of Lake Region, and Franzella appealed the judgment. Franzella raised a number of issues on appeal related to the trial court’s findings of fact, which were not reviewed by the appeals court because of her failure to provide the court with a complete transcript of the trial court proceedings. The court did consider Franzella’s argument that the trial court erred in allowing Lake Region to foreclose on Crystal’s perfected state water permit because the permit may not be the subject of a valid security interest as a general intangible. General intangibles are certain types of personal property that may have no material form but represent things of value. Franzella did not present the court with any cases that would support her argument.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Levine, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership