Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Lake River Corp. v. Carborundum Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
769 F.2d 1284 (1985)


Facts

Carborundum Co. (Carborundum) (defendant) produces Ferro Carbo, which is a powder used in steel manufacturing. Carborundum entered into a distribution contract with Lake River Corp. (Lake River) (plaintiff), under which Lake River would bag the Ferro Carbo in its warehouses and ship it to Carborundum’s customers.  Because Lake River had to purchase new equipment to fulfill the agreement, it insisted that Carborundum agree to ship a minimum quantity of Ferro Carbo within three years or pay the difference. Subsequently, demand for steel fell, and Carborundum did not meet the minimum shipments it had guaranteed. Lake River billed Carborundum for the $241,000 difference and refused to release the Ferro Carbo in its warehouses to Carborundum’s customers until Carborundum paid. Carborundum refused and spent $31,000 shipping in alternative product to fulfill its outstanding customer orders. Lake River sued in federal court under diversity jurisdiction, arguing that the minimum shipment requirement was effectively a liquidated damages clause. Carborundum counterclaimed, seeking to recover the Ferro Carbo Lake River retained and its expenses in replacing it, which totaled about $269,000. Lake River argued that it had not converted the Ferro Carbo, but rather that it had a lien. The judge sustained both parties’ claims. After offsetting the parties’ damages, Lake River owed Carborundum about $42,000. The parties cross-appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.