United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 225 (1957)
A Los Angeles, California city ordinance required any individual, living within the city limits, convicted of an offense “punishable as a felony” in the state or who would otherwise be punishable in the state if convicted in a different state, to register with the Chief of Police. No element of willfulness was included in the ordinance. Lambert (defendant) was charged with violating the ordinance. At trial, Lambert attempted to show that she had no knowledge of the requirement, but the trial judge refused to allow the evidence. Lambert was found guilty by a jury, fined $250, and sentenced to three years probation. Lambert appealed. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether the registration requirement violated due process where it applied to a person who did not have actual knowledge of the requirements and where no showing was made of the probability of such knowledge.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)
Dissent (Frankfurter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 238,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.