Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Lambert v. California

355 U.S. 225 (1957)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...

Lambert v. California

United States Supreme Court

355 U.S. 225 (1957)

Lambert v. California

Facts

A Los Angeles, California city ordinance required any individual, living within the city limits, convicted of an offense “punishable as a felony” in the state or who would otherwise be punishable in the state if convicted in a different state, to register with the Chief of Police. No element of willfulness was included in the ordinance. Lambert (defendant) was charged with violating the ordinance. At trial, Lambert attempted to show that she had no knowledge of the requirement, but the trial judge refused to allow the evidence. Lambert was found guilty by a jury, fined $250, and sentenced to three years probation. Lambert appealed. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether the registration requirement violated due process where it applied to a person who did not have actual knowledge of the requirements and where no showing was made of the probability of such knowledge.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)

Dissent (Frankfurter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,500 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership