Lampkin v. District of Columbia
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
879 F. Supp. 116 (1995)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
The District of Columbia (defendant) administered services for homeless families with school-aged children via a number of disparate agencies. First, a family had to register for shelter with the Office of Emergency Shelter and Support Services (OESSS), which would place the family on a waiting list. Once the OESSS, using a process that could take weeks, determined that a family was homeless, it began the process of placing the family in the Center City Hotel. Only after a family entered the Center City Hotel did the Transitory Students Technical Assistance Branch (TSTAB) begin the process of ensuring that the school-aged children were able to attend public schools. A group of homeless mothers of school-aged children (plaintiffs) sued the District of Columbia, arguing that the district’s procedures violated the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (McKinney Act). The mothers sought an injunction compelling the district to alter its procedures for placing homeless students in appropriate public school settings.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lamberth, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.