Lampkin v. District of Columbia

879 F. Supp. 116 (1995)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lampkin v. District of Columbia

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
879 F. Supp. 116 (1995)

Facts

The District of Columbia (defendant) administered services for homeless families with school-aged children via a number of disparate agencies. First, a family had to register for shelter with the Office of Emergency Shelter and Support Services (OESSS), which would place the family on a waiting list. Once the OESSS, using a process that could take weeks, determined that a family was homeless, it began the process of placing the family in the Center City Hotel. Only after a family entered the Center City Hotel did the Transitory Students Technical Assistance Branch (TSTAB) begin the process of ensuring that the school-aged children were able to attend public schools. A group of homeless mothers of school-aged children (plaintiffs) sued the District of Columbia, arguing that the district’s procedures violated the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (McKinney Act). The mothers sought an injunction compelling the district to alter its procedures for placing homeless students in appropriate public school settings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lamberth, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership