Lancaster v. Gilbert Development

736 P.2d 237 (1987)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lancaster v. Gilbert Development

Utah Supreme Court
736 P.2d 237 (1987)

Facts

James Lancaster (plaintiff) was a 43-year-old worker at Brian Head Ski Resort (the resort), located at 10,000 feet above sea level. On February 17, 1984, Lancaster suffered a heart attack while clearing snow with a backhoe at the resort. Lancaster was at a higher risk of heart attacks because he had smoked for 20 years and had high cholesterol, elevated uric acid, and borderline diabetes. Lancaster sought workers’-compensation benefits for his heart attack. In proceedings before an administrative-law judge (ALJ) at the State Industrial Commission (defendant), Lancaster’s physician testified that the high altitude, cold weather, and conditions under which Lancaster was clearing the snow probably precipitated Lancaster’s heart attack. However, a cardiologist testified that although Lancaster’s physical history placed him at a higher risk of developing coronary artery disease than other men his age, the cardiologist did not consider Lancaster’s work to be a risk factor for a heart attack. The cardiologist further testified that he would guess that Lancaster’s heart attack was 90 percent attributable to Lancaster’s preexisting conditions and 10 percent attributable to Lancaster’s work conditions. A doctor for Utah’s State Insurance Fund (defendant) testified that Lancaster’s heart attack was not due to his working conditions. The doctor said that Lancaster’s heart attack was instead the normal progression of coronary artery disease exacerbated by Lancaster’s other conditions. The ALJ denied Lancaster’s claim, finding that Lancaster had not shown that his heart attack was an injury by accident that was caused by Lancaster’s exertion during work. Lancaster sought review from the Utah Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Durham, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership