Lanci v. Metropolitan Insurance Co.
Pennsylvania Superior Court
564 A.2d 972 (1989)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Lanci (plaintiff) was in settlement negotiations with his insurer, Metropolitan Insurance Co. (Metropolitan) (defendant) related to a car accident. Lanci agreed to accept a $15,000 settlement and signed a release. The letter from Lanci’s attorney to Metropolitan confirming the settlement stated that Lanci agreed to accept $15,000 in settlement of the claim, “which sum you have represented to be the straight and/or stacked policy limits applicable to this claim.” The actual limit under Lanci’s policy was $250,000. Metropolitan moved to enforce the settlement agreement. The trial court denied the motion, finding that the letter showed a mutual mistake about the policy limits. Metropolitan appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Melinson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.