Landeros v. Flood

551 P.2d 389 (1976)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Landeros v. Flood

California Supreme Court
551 P.2d 389 (1976)

DC

Facts

On April 26, 1970, an 11-month-old child (plaintiff) was taken by her mother to San Jose Hospital (defendant) and examined by Dr. Flood (defendant). The child had a spiral fracture on her right tibia and fibula that appeared to be caused by a twisting force. The child also had a number of other injuries on other parts of her body at various stages of healing. The child’s mother did not have an explanation for her fracture. The child demonstrated fear when approached by medical staff, and her symptoms were consistent with battered-child syndrome. Flood did not order any X-rays, and the child returned home with her mother. On July 1, 1971, the child was taken to a different hospital and evaluated by a different physician. This time, the child had a traumatic blow to her eye, puncture wounds, bite marks, and burns on her hand. Battered-child syndrome was diagnosed immediately, the child was taken into protective custody and placed in foster care, and the child’s mother and the mother’s common-law husband were later convicted of criminal child abuse. The child subsequently brought a medical-malpractice action against Dr. Flood and San Jose Hospital. The trial court dismissed the child’s complaint, and the child appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mosk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership