Landeshauptstadt Kiel v. Jaeger

C-151/02 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Landeshauptstadt Kiel v. Jaeger

European Court of Justice
C-151/02 (2003)

Facts

A German doctor (defendant) was a surgeon at a hospital (plaintiff). The doctor worked six periods of on-call duty each month. On-call duty would begin after a normal working day. The period of on-call duty was 16 hours during the week and the entire day on weekends. When on-call, the doctor was required to stay at the hospital, where he had a room with a bed and could sleep in between being called to duty. Under this arrangement, the doctor was at the hospital for long periods without actually performing any services. A lawsuit arose. A conflict arose between European Union law and German law. Under European Union law, working time included “any period during which the worker is working, at the employer’s disposal and carrying out his activity or duties.” Rest periods were any periods that were not working times. But under German law, there were three categories of work: readiness for work, on-call service, and standby. Only readiness for work was full working time, whereas the other two categories were rest times (except when an employee was performing services). In addition, European Union law provided for daily minimum rest periods, rest breaks, and maximum weekly hours, including overtime. German courts referred the matter to the European Court of Justice to resolve the conflict.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership