Landmark Trust (USA), Inc. v. Goodhue

172 Vt. 515, 782 A.2d 1219 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Landmark Trust (USA), Inc. v. Goodhue

Vermont Supreme Court
172 Vt. 515, 782 A.2d 1219 (2001)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Fred Holbrook was the sole shareholder of Scott Farm, Inc., which owned and operated an apple orchard. Fred ran Scott Farm from the early 1950s through 1995 and repeatedly expressed his intent to preserve Scott Farm from development. In 1992, Fred sold a small portion of Scott Farm, containing Rudyard Kipling’s former home, Naulakha, to Landmark Trust (USA), Inc. (Landmark) (plaintiff), a land-preservation nonprofit. In early 1994, pleased with Landmark’s work on Naulakha, Fred inquired whether Landmark would be interested in operating and maintaining Scott Farm. In June 1995, Fred executed a deed of trust transferring Scott Farm to Landmark. Fred did not fund an endowment to offset the cost of operating Scott Farm, and Landmark would not financially profit from operating Scott Farm. Subsequently, Fred’s mental acuity sharply declined, and he was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. Shortly after, John Goodhue (defendant), Fred’s cousin, expressed interest in acquiring Scott Farm. Goodhue petitioned for, and was appointed, Fred’s involuntary guardian. Goodhue challenged Fred’s gift of Scott Farm to Landmark, arguing it was the product of undue influence and that Fred’s mental decline after executing the deed of trust proved he lacked donative capacity. Landmark countered, arguing that contemporaneous evidence of Fred’s capacity at the time of the gift demonstrated his donative capacity. Fred’s attorneys and bank trust officer, all present for the execution of the deed of trust to Landmark, testified that Fred had the capacity to execute the deed of trust and that the gift was consistent with Fred’s wishes. The trial court upheld the gift, finding that Fred understood the nature and effect of the gift and that it was consistent with his goal to preserve Scott Farm as an apple orchard. Goodhue appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership