Langan v. Valicopters, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
567 P.2d 218 (1977)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Patrick and Dorothy Langan (plaintiffs) raised organic crops on a small farm in Washington. They belonged to the Northwest Organic Food Producers’ Association (the association). The association prohibited its members from marketing as organic any food having pesticide residue of more than 10 percent of the residue permitted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Thalheimer Farms was adjacent to the Langans’ farm. Thalheimer Farms hired Valicopters, Inc. (defendant) to spray for Colorado beetle infestation using the pesticides Thiodan and Guthion. On one of the helicopter’s passes, the pilot began spraying while still over the Langans’ farm, coating the Langans’ tomatoes, beans, garlic, cucumbers, and Jerusalem artichokes. The FDA’s tolerance for Thiodan is 2 parts per million. The Langans’ tomatoes registered Thiodan residue of 1.4 parts per million. The level of residue was greater than that permitted by the association for organic growers. Consequently, the Langans destroyed their tomato and bean crops. The Langans sued Valicopters. At trial, the trial court instructed the jury that Valicopters was strictly liable for any damage to the Langans’ crops that was proximately caused by spraying. The jury found in favor of the Langans, awarding them damages of $5,500. Valicopters appealed. The court of appeals certified the case to the Supreme Court of Washington.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dolliver J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.