Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

LaPlante v. Radisson Hotel Co.

292 F. Supp. 705 (1968)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...

LaPlante v. Radisson Hotel Co.

United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

292 F. Supp. 705 (1968)

Facts

Elizabeth LaPlante (plaintiff) attended an evening banquet at a hotel operated by the Radisson Hotel Company (the Radisson) (defendant). The Radisson placed long banquet tables 42 inches apart. LaPlante testified that normally there are 18 inches between the edge of the table and the back of her chair; that at the banquet her chair touched the chair behind her; and if the tables were 42 inches apart and the chairs were 18 inches from the table, that left only a six-inch aisle. From the end of LaPlante’s table, waitresses passed food down person to person because they could not move down the aisle. LaPlante left at 11:15 p.m., before the banquet was over and while the lights were dimmed. She moved sideways between the tables, and various people scooted in to make room. It was dark, and although LaPlante could see her feet, she tripped and was injured. LaPlante then sued the Radisson for negligence. The jury returned a verdict for LaPlante. The Radisson filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The Radisson argued LaPlante offered no evidence of what reasonably prudent hotel management would do under the same or similar circumstances and that the jury should not have been allowed to speculate as to the appropriate standard of care. The Radisson also claimed the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in its favor regarding LaPlante’s contributory negligence and assumption of risk.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Neville, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 608,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 608,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 608,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 34,000 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership