Lara-Chacon v. Ashcroft
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
345 F.3d 1148 (2003)
- Written by Christopher Bova, JD
Facts
Lara-Chacon (defendant) was born in Mexico and entered the United States in 1970 as an immigrant. In 1999 he pleaded guilty to five counts of conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of Arizona state law. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) then began removal proceedings based on charges of three aggravated felonies pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (INA): money laundering in excess of $10,000, illicit trafficking in a controlled substance, and a controlled substance violation. The immigration judge dismissed the money laundering charge but found that Lara-Chacon's conviction constituted a violation of state law relating to a controlled substance, making Lara-Chacon removable under the INA. The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed and Lara-Chacon appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tashima, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.