Laredo National Bank v. Gordon

61 F.2d 906 (1932)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Laredo National Bank v. Gordon

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
61 F.2d 906 (1932)

  • Written by Joseph Bowman, JD
Play video

Facts

Gordon (plaintiff), an attorney, previously represented Laredo National Bank (Laredo) (defendant) in a prior action. The prior case was subject to extended settlement negotiations. At one point before the prior case was settled, Laredo sent Gordon a telegram, requesting the amount of his minimum fees, in the event of a resolution to the matter. Gordon responded that his fee would be $12,500. He received no response from Laredo regarding this fee. Gordon continued to represent Laredo, and the case settled. Only then did Laredo notify Gordon that $12,500 was an unreasonable fee that would not be paid. Gordon sued to recover the $12,500 fee. At trial, Laredo argued that it was not obligated to pay the fee, because it never agreed to the offer. The trial court directed a verdict in Gordon’s favor, and Laredo appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bryan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership