Larios v. Cox

300 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (2004)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Larios v. Cox

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
300 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (2004)

KS

Facts

The 2000 US Census determined that Georgia’s population was 8,163,453 individuals. From 1990 to 2000, the population of northern Georgia grew at a faster rate than the population of southern Georgia. The areas of fastest growth were Republican-leaning areas. In 2001 and 2002, redistricting plans were enacted for the Georgia state legislature. The Georgia redistricting plan created districts with a deviation from population equality of 9.98 percent without justifying such a deviation. Sara Larios (plaintiff) sued Georgia Secretary of State Cathy Cox (defendant), challenging the redistricting plan as unconstitutional on multiple grounds. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia held most of the claims in abeyance; however, the court considered Larios’s claim that the plan violated the one-person, one-vote principle of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership