Larsen v. Oil & Gas Conservation Commission

569 P.2d 87 (1977)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Larsen v. Oil & Gas Conservation Commission

Wyoming Supreme Court
569 P.2d 87 (1977)

SC

Facts

Apache Exploration Corporation (Apache) applied to the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (Commission) (defendant) to establish 80-acre drilling units for producing hydrocarbons. The Commission had the authority to establish drilling units of a specified size “[w]hen required, to protect correlative rights or, to prevent or to assist in preventing [prohibited waste].” Larsen and other royalty interest owners on some of the land subject to Apache’s application (plaintiffs) were opposed to the application because they believed that the proposed direction of the units would deprive them of their correlative rights. The Commission found that the establishment of the units would “protect correlative rights of each owner . . . in the field and [would] prevent or assist in preventing [prohibited waste].” The Commission’s order made reference to the approximate amount of oil that could be recovered from the pool as a whole. The Commission’s order did not, however, reference the plaintiffs’ correlative rights, nor did it state the amount of oil that could be recovered under the various units established in the order. The order also did not determine how much oil could be recovered without waste. The plaintiffs appealed the order of the Commission. The district court affirmed the order. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rose, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership