Latham v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
818 S.W.2d 673 (1991)
Roberta Latham (plaintiff) was an employee of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart) (defendant). Roberta, who wanted a pet, asked Wal-Mart to order a parrot for this purpose. Wal-Mart did not otherwise purchase or sell parrots, but specially ordered the parrot as a favor to Roberta. Roberta and her husband, James Latham (plaintiff), paid Wal-Mart and took the parrot home. The parrot was infected with psittacosis, a disease similar to pneumonia that can be transmitted to humans. The parrot transmitted the disease to James. The Lathams brought a products-liability suit based on strict liability against Wal-Mart and the manager of Roberta’s store, Charles Bezoni (defendant), alleging that the parrot was defective. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The Lathams appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gaertner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.