Latimer-Looney Chevrolet, Inc. v. Commissioner

19 T.C. 120 (1952)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Latimer-Looney Chevrolet, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
19 T.C. 120 (1952)

Facts

Latimer-Looney Chevrolet, Inc. (Latimer-Looney) (plaintiff) operated a General Motors franchise selling new and used Chevrolet and Cadillac vehicles. Latimer-Looney acquired new inventory through a floor-plan-financing arrangement with General Motors, paying a nominal handling fee and interest on vehicles held more than five days without payment. New vehicles sold to customers were required to remain unused and were typically delivered to customers shortly after arrival. However, Latimer-Looney designated certain new vehicles as company cars. Once designated, Latimer-Looney paid for the cars in full, insured them for its benefit, and registered them in its own name. Afterward, there were no restrictions on the vehicles’ use. The cars were used for various legitimate business purposes, including manager travel, customer service, vehicle towing and delivery, employee transportation, business-related errands, and civic programs. To avoid an increase in operating costs and a decrease in value, company cars were sold after accumulating between 8,000 and 12,000 miles and being held for over a year. On its 1949 tax return, Latimer-Looney claimed $3,214.34 in depreciation deductions for 26 company cars and reported $5,691.54 in long-term capital gains from the sale of 10 company cars. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) assessed a deficiency, asserting that the company cars did not qualify for § 1231 treatment because they remained inventory and were held for sale to customers. Latimer-Looney petitioned the tax court for a redetermination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hill, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership