Iowa Supreme Court
376 N.W.2d 108 (1985)
Richard Laube and Judy Laube (plaintiffs) contracted to buy a farm from Vernon Thomas and Betty Thomas (defendants). Prior to the Laubes taking possession, the Thomases cut down and removed about 100 walnut trees from the farm. No timber rights had been reserved by the Laubes. The Laubes sued for damages, conceding that the trees were timber or forest with no ornamental or windbreak value. The Laubes presented expert evidence establishing that the trees, at their current age, were not at their reasonable market potential. The Laubes estimated damages by taking the market value of the trees if the trees were the same size and quality but 20 years older, and then discounting the figure to present value. The trial court, however, fixed the award on the basis of the trees’ current market value as lumber. The Laubes appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Harris, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.