Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Laumann v. National Hockey League

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
907 F. Supp. 2d 465 (2012)


Facts

Each team in the National Hockey League (NHL) (defendant) and Major League Baseball (MLB) (defendant) owned the initial rights to telecast its games. Most games were telecast pursuant to agreements between teams and regional sports networks (RSNs) (defendants). The RSNs then sold the telecasts to consumers (plaintiffs) through multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs) such as Comcast and DirecTV (defendants). MVPDs telecast NHL and MLB games to only those consumers that were within an RSN’s designated service area. In other words, through a standard MVPD package, a consumer could watch only the games of his or her local, in-market team. Games of other out-of-market teams were blacked out. However, consumers could also purchase a national package telecasting all out-of-market games. This was an all-or-nothing package in that a consumer could not choose one out-of-market game or team, but was required to purchase all out-of-market games. In-market games were not telecast as part of this package, meaning that the only way for a consumer to view an in-market game was via a subscription to an MVPD. The plaintiffs brought an antitrust suit against the defendants alleging that the agreements harmed competition in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The defendants jointly filed a motion to dismiss.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Scheindlin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.