Lawrence v. Delkamp

620 N.W.2d 151 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lawrence v. Delkamp

North Dakota Supreme Court
620 N.W.2d 151 (2000)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

John Lawrence (plaintiff) and Tina Delkamp (defendant) were unmarried and had a son, Rylan, together. The parties litigated the matter of child custody. Evidence showed that Lawrence had threatened Delkamp on various occasions. One time, Lawrence threatened Delkamp that he would have his girlfriend “beat the crap out” of Delkamp if she pursued the issue of child support. Lawrence also told Delkamp that she would not be seeing Rylan after he was in Lawrence’s care and, on another occasion, that Lawrence could “eliminate” Rylan in a boating accident. Further, Lawrence threatened not to return Rylan to Delkamp after a visit unless Delkamp agreed to let Lawrence claim Rylan as an exemption on Lawrence’s tax return. Under the state child-custody statute, custody was awarded based on a child’s best interests, but the existence of domestic violence, as defined, created a rebuttable presumption against an award of custody to the perpetrator. The trial court found domestic violence and awarded custody to Delkamp, with supervised visits to Lawrence. Lawrence appealed, challenging the finding of domestic violence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (VandeWalle, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership