Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
457 S.W.2d 561 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970)
Lawrence (defendant) was charged with felony theft. At trial, during the prosecution’s direct examination of its primary witness, the prosecution asked the witness the following: “Did you buy approximately eleven hundred ninety-nine pounds of metal back at that time?” Lawrence objected to the question as leading. The trial judge sustained the objection and instructed the jury not to consider the question for any purpose. The prosecution then rephrased and asked: “Do you recall how much of this virgin nickel you bought back in July of 1966?” The witness responded that he bought eleven hundred ninety-nine pounds. To this, Lawrence objected again, stating that the prosecution “put words in his mouth and then asked him again.” The trial court overruled this objection. The jury convicted Lawrence. Lawrence appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Belcher, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.