Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Lawrence v. Town of Concord

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
788 N.E.2d 546 (2003)


Facts

Helen Burke Frazier inherited a house and lot from her adoptive mother, with the condition that the property would pass to the town of Concord (defendant) if she died without issue. After she died without issue in 1965, her husband Joseph Frazier rented out the property for several years. In his will, admitted to probate in 1997, he devised it to Albert Lawrence (plaintiff). Lawrence asserted that Frazier had acquired title to the property through adverse possession. The town took possession of the property through eminent domain and refused to pay damages to Lawrence on the grounds that it had held title to it since Helen Burke Frazier’s death. Lawrence sued for damages. The trial court granted the town’s motion for summary judgment, holding that there was no adverse possession because the town did not have notice that it owned the property and therefore Frazier’s possession was not notorious and adverse. The court of appeals affirmed, finding there was ample evidence that Frazier’s possession was not adverse. Lawrence then appealed to the state supreme court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Spina, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.