Lawton v. Nyman

327 F.3d 30 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lawton v. Nyman

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
327 F.3d 30 (2003)

Facts

A closely held, family-owned corporation, Nyman Manufacturing Company (NMC), was financially struggling. NMC had Class A non-voting stock and Class B voting stock. Two brothers, Robert and Kenneth Nyman (the Nymans) (defendants), were the managing officers and directors of NMC, owned all of NMC’s voting stock, and were controlling shareholders. Non-voting stock was owned by other family, including the Nymans’ sister, Judith Lawton (plaintiff). In an effort to restore NMC’s financial condition, the Nymans hired Keith Johnson (defendant) in 1994 as chief financial officer and treasurer. NMC thrived with Johnson’s influence. By 1996, NMC’s shareholder equity had quadrupled in value. On May 8, 1996, Johnson sent a letter to shareholders (other than the Nymans), on behalf of NMC, with NMC’s offer to redeem (or buy) all Class A non-voting stock for $200 per share. The price was not based on an appraisal and was neither current market value nor book value. The letter did not disclose how the price had been determined and also contained misrepresentations, including an implication that NMC’s lenders required a May 22, 1996 deadline on the offer. Further, though NMC management provided lenders with unaudited financial information showing increased profits in 1996, Lawton and the other minority shareholders were not provided with the same. Moreover, unbeknownst to the minority, NMC management hired a consultant to assist in a sale of NMC and engaged in discussions with potential buyers. On May 10, 1996, all minority shareholders decided to sell their NMC shares back to NMC. Consequently, the Nymans and Johnson owned all of NMC’s outstanding equity. In September 1997, Nymans and Johnson sold their NMC shares to Van Leer Corporation (VLC). VLC paid approximately $1,667 per share for the Class A shares and approximately $2,167 per share for the Class B shares. The minority shareholders sued the Nymans and Johnson for breach of fiduciary duty to the minority shareholders. The district court ruled the Nymans and Johnson had breached their fiduciary duty to the minority shareholders. Nymans and Johnson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership