Layne v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
460 A.2d 1088 (1983)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
Layne (plaintiff) leased property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and requested to operate the property as a boarding house. The Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh (the zoning board) (defendant) denied Layne’s request because her property was located in a R-4 residential zoning district, in which boarding houses were not permitted. The purpose of the R-4 residential classification was to exclude commercial entities from residential areas. Boarding houses were not permitted in R-4 residential districts because they provided meals, which invoked the City of Pittsburgh’s health code, and lodging to individuals who did not live there. Rooming houses were allowed in R-4 residential districts because they only provided lodging to individuals who did not live there, but no meals. Layne filed suit against the zoning board. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Layne, ruling that boarding houses could not be rationally excluded from the R-4 residential district when rooming houses were allowed. The zoning board appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McDermott, J.)
Dissent (Flaherty, J.)
Dissent (Nix, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.