Lazore v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

11 F.3d 1180 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lazore v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
11 F.3d 1180 (1993)

Facts

Glenny and Carol Lazore (plaintiffs) were members of the Mohawk Nation in New York, which was one of the six Indian tribes that composed the Haudenosaunee. Pursuant to the 1794 Treaty of Canandaigua (the treaty)—which stated, in part, that the Haudenosaunee were guaranteed the free use and enjoyment of their land—the Haudenosaunee largely operated as a separate nation with its own government. The treaty predated the federal income tax. Glenny worked as a mechanic for a metal company, and Carol worked for the Mohawk Nation. On their 1986 federal income-tax return, the Lazores reported the income from their jobs as nontaxable income. However, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed a deficiency. The Lazores filed a petition in tax court, claiming that, as members of the Mohawk Nation, they were exempt from federal income tax pursuant to the treaty. After a trial in which the Lazores presented substantial historical evidence showing that the Haudenosaunee understood the treaty to grant the tribe status as a separate nation, the tax court held that the Lazores were not exempt from federal income tax. The Lazores appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Roth, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership