Lea v. United States
United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
882 F. Supp. 687 (1995)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
William Lea (plaintiff) was an accountant. In August 1987, Lea was convicted of seven counts of aiding and abetting the filing of false tax returns. Lea’s misconduct helped cause more than $160,000 in tax losses to the United States (defendant). Additionally, the United States devoted substantial resources investigating Lea and bringing him to trial. Lea was sentenced to prison and was fined $1,000 for each of the seven counts. In March 1990, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) imposed a $34,000 civil penalty against Lea pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6701. This penalty was later reduced to $22,000. Lea sued the United States, alleging that the civil penalty (1) was barred by the statute of limitations and (2) violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it was punitive. The United States moved for summary judgment on the grounds that (1) there was no statute of limitations regarding the initial assessment of a civil penalty pursuant to § 6701 and (2) the civil penalty was remedial and thus did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Todd, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.