League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. North Carolina

769 F.3d 224 (2014)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. North Carolina

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
769 F.3d 224 (2014)

  • Written by Philip Glass, JD

Facts

North Carolina, a state with a history of racial discrimination, passed several voting laws in 2013. This followed the Court's 2013 lessening of Voting Rights Act limitations incumbent on states. In particular, three North Carolina laws provoked controversy. Opponents of these laws alleged that these laws violated § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. One law overturned 2007 legislation that allowed same-day voter registration. Another law forbade provisional ballot-casting outside a voter's precinct of registration. The last of these controversial laws placed restrictions on early voting. These stipulations included withdrawing the discretion previously afforded counties in keeping polls open. African Americans disproportionately engaged in same-day voter registration, provisional ballot-casting, and early voting. The district court ruled that North Carolina's laws did not suppress votes in contravention of § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wynn, J.)

Dissent (Motz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership