League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. North Carolina
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
769 F.3d 224 (2014)
- Written by Philip Glass, JD
Facts
North Carolina, a state with a history of racial discrimination, passed several voting laws in 2013. This followed the Court's 2013 lessening of Voting Rights Act limitations incumbent on states. In particular, three North Carolina laws provoked controversy. Opponents of these laws alleged that these laws violated § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. One law overturned 2007 legislation that allowed same-day voter registration. Another law forbade provisional ballot-casting outside a voter's precinct of registration. The last of these controversial laws placed restrictions on early voting. These stipulations included withdrawing the discretion previously afforded counties in keeping polls open. African Americans disproportionately engaged in same-day voter registration, provisional ballot-casting, and early voting. The district court ruled that North Carolina's laws did not suppress votes in contravention of § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wynn, J.)
Dissent (Motz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.