LeBeau v. Libby-Owens-Ford Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
484 F.2d 798 (1973)

- Written by Catherine Cotovsky, JD
Facts
Forty-six female employees (female employees) (plaintiffs) brought a class-action suit against their employer Libby-Owens-Ford Co. (LOF), their local union (Local 19), and the international union governing Local 19 (international union) (defendants) for sex discrimination at LOF’s Ottawa, Illinois plant under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The international union had negotiated a company-wide master agreement with LOF on behalf of union members that set out general rules for wages, conditions, and seniority security, among other topics. The master agreement also expressly allowed individual LOF plants to negotiate plant-specific agreements regarding seniority that varied from the master agreement. Under that provision, LOF’s Ottawa plant and Local 19 negotiated a modified seniority security agreement, under which union members were provided more protection based on seniority than the master agreement. However, those additional protections expressly applied only to male employees, and female employees were only afforded the lesser protections set out in the master agreement. Shortly after the female employees filed suit, the international union was dismissed from the case on the grounds that the international union had not been brought before the Equal Employment Opportunity Employment Commission in the original complaints, among other reasons. Upon the international union’s dismissal, LOF and Local 19 moved to dismiss the matter, claiming that the international union was an indispensable party. The district court granted LOF and Local 19’s motion, and the female employees appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,600 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.