LeBlanc v. Cleveland

198 F.3d 353, 2000 AMC 609 (1999)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

LeBlanc v. Cleveland

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
198 F.3d 353, 2000 AMC 609 (1999)

Facts

Etoile LeBlanc and Stephen Ossen (plaintiffs) were paddling a kayak in the Hudson River approximately 29 miles north of Fort Edward. The river at Fort Edward was navigable by vessels to the south to New York City and the Atlantic Ocean, and to the north through the Champlain Canal to the St. Lawrence River. However, above Fort Edward, and below the location where LeBlanc and Ossen were kayaking, numerous areas of rapids, waterfalls, and manmade dams prevented passage of any vessel to those navigable points. LeBlanc and Ossen were injured when their kayak was struck by a recreational boat operated by Terry Cleveland and owned by Robert Grant (defendants). LeBlanc and Ossen sued Cleveland and Grant in federal district court under admiralty jurisdiction. Cleveland and Grant brought a third-party complaint against JRD Retailers, Ltd. (defendant), the outfitter that had rented LeBlanc and Ossen the kayak. JRD moved to dismiss the complaints as lacking subject-matter jurisdiction. The district court granted the motion, finding that admiralty jurisdiction did not apply because the Hudson River was not navigable in the location where the accident occurred. LeBlanc and Ossen appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership