Lebo v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
977 N.E.2d 1031 (2012)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Robert Ashcraft was the junior varsity volleyball coach at LaPorte High School. Marybeth Lebo (plaintiff), the varsity volleyball coach, was Ashcraft’s supervisor. Between August 2007 and October 2008, Ashcraft sexually abused K.T., a minor volleyball player. Lebo both personally observed and received reports about multiple instances of inappropriate conduct between Ashcraft and K.T.; however, Lebo failed to report the suspected child sexual abuse. Instead, Lebo directed her volleyball players not to tell anyone about Ashcraft’s inappropriate behavior with K.T. In October 2008, Ashcraft resigned from the school. Ashcraft was subsequently investigated, charged, and convicted for sexual conduct with a minor. After Ashcraft’s arrest, the Indiana State Police started investigating whether Lebo knew about the sexual abuse. In October 2010, the state police submitted an investigation report to the prosecutor’s office indicating that Lebo knew Ashcraft was abusing K.T. but failed to report the abuse. Lebo, as a high school coach, was a mandated reporter. In September 2011, the State of Indiana (defendant) charged Lebo with failure to report child abuse, a misdemeanor. Lebo moved to dismiss, arguing that (1) the two-year statute of limitations for misdemeanors had expired; and (2) the state failed to prove Lebo had reason to believe Ashcraft had been abusing K.T. The state countered, arguing that the statute of limitations did not apply because (a) Lebo concealed the abuse; and (b) failure to report child abuse is a continuing offense. The trial court denied Lebo’s motion to dismiss. Lebo appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bradford, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.