Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
United States Supreme Court
513 U.S. 374 (1995)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Michael Lebron (plaintiff) created billboard displays that served as commentary on public issues. Lebron entered into a contract to have his advertisement displayed on a very large billboard in Penn Station known as the Spectacular. The contract noted that the advertisement had to be reviewed by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, commonly known as Amtrak (defendant), which owned the billboard. Amtrak was created by the Rail Passenger Service Act, a federal statute, and the statute provided that most of the board of directors be appointed by the President of the United States. Congress specifically determined that continuing and improving railroad-passenger service was required by the public convenience and necessity. Amtrak continued to apply the same policy adopted by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Amtrak’s predecessor, which prohibited all political advertising on the Spectacular. Lebron later submitted a description of his planned advertisement, which was going to link Coors beer with right-wing political issues, including showing cans of Coors beer as missiles heading into a Nicaraguan village. Amtrak disapproved the advertisement based on its policy prohibiting political advertisements. Lebron filed a lawsuit, alleging that Amtrak violated the First Amendment in disapproving the advertisement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 798,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.