Lee Kuan Yew v. Vinocur & Ors
Singapore High Court
1996-2 SLR 542 (1996)
- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
Lee Kuan Yew (plaintiff) was a senior minister in the prime minister of Singapore’s office and was a former prime minister of Singapore. Lee brought a libel suit seeking damages against John Vinocur and three other individuals (defendants) who were involved in or affiliated with the publication of an article in the International Herald Tribune. The article claimed that intolerant political regimes in Asia used ingenious methods of suppressing dissent, including some that relied on a collaborating judiciary willing to use the judicial system to bankrupt political opponents. Lee claimed that the article was understood to mean that he had sought to suppress legitimate and democratic activity in Singapore by suing political opponents for defamation and relying on a compliant judiciary to grant judgment in his favor, thereby bankrupting his political opponents. Three of the defendants eventually published an apology to Lee in the International Herald Tribune. The remaining individual, the article’s author, did not appear in court and did not present a defense to the defamation lawsuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rajendran, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.