From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
Lee v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
505 U.S. 830, 112 S.Ct. 2709 (1992)
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey owns and operates three major airports in the New York City area and controls terminals at the airports. The airports were funded by user fees and were operated to make a profit. The terminals were generally accessible to the public and contained restaurants and snack stands, bars, newsstands, and stores. Most people who came to the terminals were airline or terminal employees, or they were at the terminals for air-travel-related purposes, such as taking a flight or accompanying passengers. The Port Authority adopted a regulation forbidding the repetitive solicitation of money and the distribution of literature within the terminals. However, the Port Authority permitted solicitation and distribution on the sidewalks outside the terminal buildings. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. (ISKCON) (plaintiff) is a religious group whose members solicit funds and distribute literature in public places to support its movement. ISKCON brought an action against Walter Lee (defendant), a Port Authority official, in federal district court on the grounds that the regulation abridged the group’s First Amendment rights. The district court granted summary judgment to ISKCON. The court of appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part, upholding the solicitation ban and striking down the distribution ban. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. In a separate opinion, International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, 505 U.S. 672 (1992), the Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court’s judgment upholding the solicitation ban.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Dissent (Rehnquist, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.