Lee v. Jenkins Bros.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
268 F.2d 357 (1959)
Jenkins Brothers (defendant) purchased the Crane Company. Lee (plaintiff) was the Crane Company’s business manager. Yardley was Jenkins’ president and a substantial stockholder. Yardley and Jenkins’ vice president met with Lee to convince him to join Jenkins. At the meeting, Yardley agreed orally, on behalf of Jenkins, that Lee would be paid a pension when he reached the age of 60, at an amount not to exceed $1,500 a year, even if he were no longer working for Jenkins at that time. Lee joined Jenkins for 25 years, but was then discharged at the age of 55. Jenkins argued that Yardley did not have the authority to bind Jenkins to the pension agreement. The trial court found as a matter of law that the contract was extraordinary, and that Yardley had no authority to bind Jenkins to it.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Medina, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.