Lee v. Paulsen
Oregon Supreme Court
273 Or. 103 (1975)
- Written by Brian Meadors, JD
Facts
James Lee (plaintiff), a teacher, received a letter from his employer school district. The letter notified Lee that his contract would not be renewed. The letter gave no reasons. Lee wrote to the school district’s lawyer asking for an explanation and a hearing. The district’s lawyer responded with a letter giving specific reasons, which Lee asserted were defamatory, and informing Lee that at the hearing, the district would give no evidence and allow no questioning of the board members to clarify its reasoning. At the hearing, Lee’s attorney asked the district to state the contents of the letter that contained the defamatory information about Lee. Lee sued the school officials and district board members (defendants) for defamation. The trial court ruled in favor of the school district. Lee appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Denecke, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.