Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
L

Lee v. Washington

390 U.S. 333 (1968)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lee v. Washington

United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 333 (1968)

Facts

Certain Alabama statutes required the segregation of persons in state prisons and jails based on race. Caliph Washington and other Black detainees (plaintiffs) sued Frank Lee (defendant), Alabama’s commissioner of corrections, arguing that the statutes violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. A three-judge district-court panel held that the statutes were unconstitutional and ordered the desegregation of Alabama’s penal institutions. Lee appealed to the United States Supreme Court, arguing that the statutes were constitutional and that the district court’s order for desegregation failed to provide necessary leeway to ensure prison security and discipline.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Concurrence (Black, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Key Terms