Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Leeds v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey
752 A.2d 332 (2000)


Facts

Attorney Louis Egnasko accepted a settlement check on behalf of his clients, William and Carol Leeds (plaintiffs). The check was a teller’s check drawn at Summit Bank (Summit) (defendant) and payable to the Leedses. Egnasko altered the check by typing “Louis Egnasko as attorney for” above the payee line containing the Leedses’ names. Egnasko endorsed the check and deposited it into his attorney trust account at Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase) (defendant). Chase presented the check to Summit, and Summit honored the check. Egnasko later drew a check for the amount owed to the Leedses, payable to the Leedses, from an account at the Trust Company of New Jersey (Trustco). That account contained funds that Egnasko had obtained by similarly altering a check intended for another client drawn from a different bank. Trustco honored the check drawn to the Leedses, and the Leedses received payment on the check. Trustco filed suit against Egnasko and the Leedses in New York. While that case was pending, the Leedses filed suit in New Jersey against Chase as the depository bank and Summit as the drawer, the drawee, and the payor bank, alleging strict liability for payment on the altered check to the Leedses. Chase and Summit moved for summary judgment. The lower court granted summary judgment in favor of Chase and Summit and dismissed the Leedses’ complaint. The Leedses appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wecker, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.